In this journal, the peer review process operates on a double-blind basis. Each submission undergoes assessment by a scientific Editor to ensure alignment with the journal's guidelines and focus. Typically, submitted manuscripts are evaluated by two or more subject specialists, alongside ethical and statistical Editors, within a maximum of two weeks. The feedback provided by reviewers is integral to the entire review process. The final decision by handling Editors is based on the input received from reviewers. The Editor will consider the recommendations made by authors regarding potential qualified reviewers. Authors will be notified of the Editors' ultimate decision(s).

Manuscripts may face rejection if prospective reviewers are provided deliberately falsified contact information, such as fake names or email addresses.